Shahriar Alam

- lack of substantive provisions in the agreement
- Military miscalculations by India
- Economic fallout and international implications
- messaging problems with "Operation Sindur"
- uncertain future of Kashmir
- Political consequences for the Modi government

A US Congressional delegation of Congressman Rich McCormick of Georgia and Congressman Ed Case of Hawaii met Foreign Minister Dr. A. K. Abdul Momen, M.P. today at the State Guest House Padma, where they held fruitful discussions on Bangladesh-US partnership on various areas, including trade and economy, Rohingya response, global health, climate change and upcoming general elections of Bangladesh.

The US delegation commenced their 3-day Bangladesh visit this morning by paying floral tribute at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman’s mural at the Bangabandhu Memorial Museum. Both Congressmen were accompanied by their spouses at that time. Referring to the visit as moving, Congressman said that it was indeed a great tragedy for Bangladesh to lose such a personality and that too so early.

In a world that seeks justice and accountability for egregious violations of international law, the question of why certain global powers, notably the United States and Russia, seemingly avoid facing consequences for alleged war crimes has raised concerns and debate. Despite mounting evidence and international outcry, these two nations have often managed to elude serious consequences. This article delves into some of the key factors that contribute to this phenomenon.

1. Geopolitical Influence:
The geopolitical clout of the United States and Russia on the global stage cannot be overstated. Both nations hold permanent seats on the United Nations Security Council and possess veto powers, allowing them to impede or shape international actions against them. This influence can stymie efforts to hold them accountable for alleged war crimes.

2. Selective Application of International Law:
Critics argue that there is a perceived double standard in how international law is applied. The concept of "might makes right" is often cited, wherein powerful nations are perceived to enjoy greater latitude in their actions due to their influence. This can lead to the perception that enforcement of international law is inconsistent.

3. Lack of an Independent Global Legal Authority:
The absence of a single independent authority to prosecute war crimes can hinder accountability. While the International Criminal Court (ICC) was established to address such matters, its jurisdiction is not universally recognized, and both the US and Russia are not parties to the Rome Statute that created the ICC. This limits the court's reach and effectiveness.

4. Complex Nature of International Conflicts:
Many allegations of war crimes occur within complex and multifaceted conflicts. The involvement of various actors and the blurred lines between combatants and civilians can complicate efforts to attribute responsibility accurately.

5. Political Interests and Realpolitik:
National interests often influence global responses to alleged war crimes. Economic partnerships, diplomatic negotiations, and other geopolitical considerations can deter swift and decisive action against powerful nations.

6. Lack of Solidarity Amongst Nations:
Global consensus on addressing alleged war crimes can be challenging to achieve. Political divisions and varying national interests among nations can lead to a lack of united action against accused parties.

7. Media and Public Perception:
Media portrayal and public perception can influence how war crimes are perceived. Public sentiment can influence political decisions, and nations with greater control over their media narratives can shape public opinion in their favor.

In conclusion, the question of why the United States and Russia seemingly escape accountability for alleged war crimes is complex and multifaceted. The interplay of geopolitics, international law, global power dynamics, and public perception contributes to this phenomenon. Efforts toward international justice and accountability require addressing these challenges in a balanced and comprehensive manner, striving to ensure that all nations are held to the same standards regardless of their power status.